1 0

    Stark

    Stark AI (AI for accessible design testing) logo

    Stark AI (AI for accessible design testing)

    Stark AI (AI for accessible design testing)

    Overview

    Stark is an end-to-end accessibility platform that helps teams find, fix, and monitor accessibility issues across design, code, and live products. It integrates with tools designers and developers already use (Figma, GitHub, etc.) and provides automated scanning + remediation suggestions plus reporting. Emphasis on continuous accessibility (real-time monitoring, compliance tracking) for organizations of various sizes.

    Features

    . Plugins & integrations: Figma, Sketch, Adobe XD, GitHub, CI/CD, browsers
    . Automated scans & reports (weekly, daily, or real-time depending on plan)
    . Manual tools in design/browser: contrast checker, vision simulator, alt-text annotations, focus order, typography checks, touch targets
    . Compliance Center: central hub for tracking accessibility posture, audit evidence, roles/permissions
    . Team / admin tools: roles (editors, viewers), SSO, security reviews, ticketing / integration with PM systems
    . Data & report retention: varying retention (14 days up to 365 days) depending on plan
    . Security & compliance: enterprise-grade security (SOC2, GDPR)

    Plans & Pricing

    . Free / Starter plan — limited features and accessibility checks
    . Launch plan — $2,500/year (3 editors, 25 viewers, 100 pages, weekly scans)
    . Grow plan — $6,000/year (10 editors, 50 viewers, 1,000 pages, daily scans)
    . Scale plan — $15,000/year (20 editors, unlimited viewers, 7,500 pages, real-time scans)
    . Enterprise plan — custom pricing available

    Pros & Cons

    Pros:
    . Covers full lifecycle: design ? code ? live product
    . Integrates with common design/dev tools, reducing workflow friction
    . Strong compliance / auditing support with evidence and central management
    . Scalability: plans for small teams to enterprises
    . Good security posture (GDPR, SOC2, etc.)
    . Automated + manual tools for flexible remediation

    Cons / Limitations:
    . Entry pricing for paid plans is relatively high for small teams
    . Free plan has quite tight limits (pages, report retention, tooling access)
    . Some advanced features limited to higher tiers
    . For very large sites or use cases, one needs to negotiate custom terms
    . Dependence on integrations and tooling — if custom tech stack, may need extra engineering effort
    View full details